Monday, January 28, 2013

Differentiated Instruction and Teacher Development


Why Use Differentiated Instruction
Teachers must assess the abilities of different learners, fast and slow. PLC experts demand that all kids learn, not just the gifted kids. Therefore, teachers must adjust their practice for students of different abilities. If teachers don’t adjust enough, some kids will be bored or shut down, leading to classroom management problems, and not all will learn. If the teacher adjusts too much (in the extreme, giving every student an individualized lesson) the lesson plan becomes overly fragmented and the lesson loses any forward momentum. Therefore, the instructor must employ differentiated instruction carefully.

Categorizing student abilities as high, medium, and low provides differentiation and allows for most variation in ability. (See below for a better model.) I ask myself, how will low/medium/high ability students handle this lesson, and what do I have set up in the lesson itself to allow these three different ability kids to excel? Teachers can benefit from incorporating pairing and group work in lessons, because it allows all types of kids to master the material. I avoid special lessons for the low achievers. I would rather give them extra help or extra time and use pairings and group work.

What to do right now: Experiment with pairing and group work as shown below.

Pairings
At the beginning of the school year give the kids five minutes (literally) to find four partners—their 12:00, 3:00, 6:00, and 9:00 partners. You can also do this for them to better assure randomness and a more homogeneous selection of partners or go the other direction and make sure that certain students of different abilities are working together. Later in the year, you may yell out, “Work out the reading problem with your 9:00 partner,” and everyone will know what to do and will get help from a stronger student or teach a weaker student.

Group Work
As noted above, jigsawing material works as a fun way to get kids work together to learn long readings. The stronger students take the lead in presenting the material to the rest of the class. These gifted kids know they must simplify the material for everyone else.

Advanced Work Cleverly Hidden through Choice
If I add choice to assignments, I can trick advanced kids into tackling advanced work. Many advanced kids, unfortunately, do not want to do more work and have an uncanny ability to avoid working longer than everybody else, so I offer a question that requires less time than other questions but a higher level of thinking. The gifted kids will usually bite.

Another Model for Differentiating Students
I am exploring a more complicated alternative to organizing students along one axis: high, medium, and low aptitude. I have experimented with monitoring two criteria, aptitude and willingness to work. I then differentiate instruction based on ambition in the classroom as well as ability. The Wechsler (WISC) IQ test can be substituted for ability if the assessor does not have historical grades for the student. Why use an IQ test? Outside of California, where the IQ test has been banned from schools for political reasons, IQ tests correlate very well with K-6 scholastic achievement, more modestly for the higher grades. French psychologist Alfred Binet developed the IQ test to quickly find students that needed extra help in school. As a Californian I have to make an educated guess about a student’s ability. I usually base my inferences on the student’s performance in my class, performance in earlier classes, and state test scores. Please note that I have not yet directly addressed cultural diversity and language issues.

If a student prefers not to present in public, look the teacher in the eye, or win at a game (forcing others to lose) he may not perform as well as he could in some assessments. This student may be assessed more accurately through traditional paper and pencil tests and group work that emphasizes cooperation over competition. The teacher can then more confidently evaluate this student’s willingness to work and his abilities.

I have also encountered students, usually from impoverished families, that work hard in class, but do nothing at home. They may be working a job, watching siblings, or simply be partial to a belief system that limits school work to the time spent in the classroom. These kids may be best assessed by examining their in-class work, but grades will deservedly suffer if no work is done outside the classroom. A college-prep high school curriculum demands some homework from students. What if a student does not have sufficient academic English skills to succeed in your class?

This problem can be best addressed by making literacy issues a part of your everyday curriculum. There are plenty of native-born American kids that don’t understand the meaning of key vocabulary words such as imperialism, totalitarianism, and Cold War. Teachers must address literacy issues for everyone. Once you address the literacy issues, you can better assess the English as second language (ESL) student’s talents as laid out  below. If a student does not have a good enough grasp of English to put a few sentences together on paper, that student should be in a special sheltered class specifically tailored for kids that need to work on English as well as the curriculum. This is an administration issue, not a teaching issue.

Yet despite everything, if you have students in your class with a poor grasp of English you can still assess whether they are hard workers and whether they have academic talent—ask them about their school experience in their country of origin and check on their current math grades. I want all kids to learn, and I am pained because I have had very limited success teaching kids with little or no English skills placed in a regular (not a sheltered) class. The best I can do is to enlist other kids from the same ethnic group to help teach the ESL student and use the text book publisher’s Spanish resources, which of course, are of little help if the student doesn’t speak Spanish.

If you keep diversity issues in mind, you may find a two-criterion model, below, helpful in analyzing differential instruction in your classroom.

Willingness to Work versus Classroom Ability or IQ

Ambition or Willingness                                    Student
to Work
High                 B                                              C
                                                                                               
                                                                       

                                                                                                                       
                        Low                 A                                             D


 
Low     Ability or IQ                 High
                                   
Student A has low ability and does not try to learn the material. She skips homework assignments and gives up on the class. To pass the time she talks to her friends and mocks you when your back is turned. Would this child pass the class if she worked harder? That is the million dollar question. If the answer is yes, the teacher must work with all stakeholders (parents, counselors, coaches) to motivate the student. Occasionally a “deal” will help, such as “I’ll pass you with a D minus if you pass the final with a grade of C.”

If the answer is no, we have encountered student B, and administration and counselors must work together to place the child in an appropriate class. Neither the student nor the teacher is well served by leaving student B in a class where failure is guaranteed. An immediate intervention is in order.

Student C, the denizen of AP classes and honor rolls, makes teachers look good, though student C would probably do well even if the teacher lectured in Aramaic. Paradoxically, the most ambitious and experienced teachers instruct at the AP level, but the mid and low level classes require better classroom management skills and more time differentiating instruction than the AP classes.

Student D tries, sometimes successfully and sometimes not, to get by with natural talent and information learned previously, usually outside the class. Student D is either lazy or placed in a class that does not interest her. This type of student acts as a poor role model for the rest of the class and reinforces the insidious stereotype that good students are born, not made. I want to kick these kids upstairs to the AP classes, where they are forced to perform or perish. If a D kid is stuck with me in a regular (not advanced or AP) class, I must grit my teeth and bear the frustration. These kids are used to getting by on raw talent, and my track record inspiring them to work has been rather disheartening. I was, more often than not a D kid in high school myself and didn’t start working hard until college. Perhaps if I was forced into social studies AP classes, which were nonexistent in my school at the time, I would have matured faster. A quick way of identifying whether a student is an A, B, C, or D student is by examining who feels most frustrated in the teacher-student relationship. This frustration may express itself overtly by angry acting-out behavior by either teacher or student unless both work together to solve the problem. (See below.)

Determining student type by assessing who is frustrated
Student Type
A
B
C
D
Who’s frustrated
both
student
no one
teacher
Typical comments
Teacher: “This kid doesn’t want to pass”
Student: “I hate this class.”
Student: “This class is too hard.”
Teacher: “I want 150 kids like him.”
Teacher: “This lazy kid will get his comeuppance some day.”

Possible solutions
Meet with student and parents.
Put the student in a remedial class or give the student tools to catch up.
Pray for more of these kids.
Encourage the student to enroll in an advanced class.


Most teachers balk at creating three or four variations of each lesson in an attempt to service the A, B, C, and D student types. In addition to the pairings and group work mentioned above, I have had success with interactive projects and student-centered activities. These projects and activities have enough inherent appeal and changeability that all but the most shut-down students participate in the activity and learn. These activities include:
  • Writing skits and performing them
  • Composing a political cartoon
  • Participating in a mock trial
  • Presenting with a group where all get a role

Long Range Goals for Improvement
Many of the best teachers leave teaching for the administrative track. While I can’t fault those attracted to power and leadership roles (as well as much more money), escaping the difficulties of the classroom, one can improve one’s skills and monetary situation on the teacher track as well. As a professional, the mindful teacher acts like any other professional—doctor, lawyer, or CPA—and works to hone her craft, whether or not the state demands one do so.

Competency in Core Fields and Successful Classroom Management
My graduate training was in psychology, not history, but I have a background as a voracious reader of history. As a “backdoor history teacher” my preparation was good enough to pass the state board exams for social studies but not good enough to feel comfortable teaching most history classes. I continued my reading of history, state standards under one arm and a book under the other, selecting areas of history where I felt unprepared. Additionally, I researched and wrote lessons most nights for a couple of years.

After sufficient preparation, we teachers demonstrate competency in the core classes of our discipline. In social studies, for example, one must master modern world history and American history. I became more skilled in managing a classroom, however, by watching master teachers, reflecting how my classes were going, and setting out a goal on how I wanted my classroom to work. One teacher told me that I could have whatever type of class I wanted. What he meant was that teachers can have a quiet disciplined class or a more boisterous group—it is completely up to the wishes and skills of the teacher.

Specialized Training
Many states require high school teachers to earn a masters degree. If not, get one anyway when you can. A masters degree in history makes you more marketable than a masters degree in education, but they are both worthwhile. You are more likely to be hired by the school you want, and you will earn the most off your district’s salary schedule. If necessary, max out on the number of units you need after getting the masters degree. I make between $1,000 to $6,000 per year and after ten years $10,000 to $60,000 more than teachers with the same amount of experience, simply because I have taken more classes and earned an advanced degree.

What to do right now: Pursue your District’s enrichment opportunities and ask if the training can receive course credit. Often the answer is yes. Every teacher should max out on coursework needed to earn the most on the salary schedule.

Advanced Placement Courses
After one shows competency in the most critical aspects of teaching—competency in core fields and demonstrated skill in running a classroom—many teachers enjoy specializing with advanced placement (AP) course offerings. These courses demand a superior level of knowledge and greater skills in curriculum mapping and time management. Teachers instruct and build relationships with the most talented and motivated students in the school, who eagerly pursue college-level work. In addition to strengthening your teaching capabilities, these classes heighten school board interest in your teaching. Why? Parents love AP offerings, and they will encourage their children to take these classes in the future. “If you build it, they will come.”

When I started my current teaching position, my department offered one AP US History section. Now we have two sections of AP US History and also fill multiple sections in AP European History, AP Government, and AP Macro/Micro Economics. The school population remained stable throughout. Simply having the courses available manufactured their own demand for them.

Always On the Look Out
I am always on the look out for primary source documents worthy of including in lessons. Social Education, the official journal for The National Council for the Social Studies includes ready-made lessons using primary source documents. I also scour books, newspapers and magazines, both online and print editions. Most of us have certain areas of history that we really enjoy. For example, I have read many biographies on Theodore Roosevelt and when I start reading the next one, will mark pages with sticky tags, hoping to use quotes from these sections for my AP US History class.

Working on Lesson Plans
Those that prefer creating lessons in a more institutionalized setting have plenty of opportunities. I studied American history and wrote lesson plans for a three-year (Teaching American History) TAH grant. These lessons were shared with the group, edited after receiving feedback, and then uploaded to a website for all teachers. The government awards TAH grants throughout the United States, though I think you will have more luck finding one in a major metropolitan area.

Leadership Roles
A teacher doesn’t have to become an administrator to find leadership opportunities. Schools need committee chiefs. In the last few years my school administration has looked for teacher leaders for a technology committee, a number of Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC) accreditation committees, student activities, Parent Teacher Student Association (PTSA), social studies, foreign language, English, physical education, math, science, and special education departments, and department fundraisers. Additionally, my state gives experienced teachers opportunities to mentor new teachers through the California Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) program. Other states have similar training programs.

Summing Up
Buffeted by societal changes and increased demands for performance but also benefiting from increasing availability of tools to analyze ones style and evaluate performance, teaching  has become a cutting-edge profession. Mindful teachers must examine the process, what is going on in the classroom as they teach, and the product, the data that proves that students are learning. I hope that you continue to reflect on your teaching--what works and doesn’t work—and make adjustments in that never-ending quest for excellence and learning.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Teacher by Day, Drummer by Night

Teacher by Day, Drummer by Night
Please recommend this blog to others

Popular Posts